The big story currently sweeping the cyber saloons which most of us frequent, regards a new grovelling plea, from former Branch Covidians, for an "amnesty" regarding their hideous, horrifying, and largely non-human behaviour during "the pandemic".

The general thrust of their argument is, "yes, okay, we DID behave hideously, horrifyingly, and non-humanly, but we didn't know any better. Now, can't we all forget about it and move on? After all, those of you who got it right from day one and pleaded with us not to destroy our societies, our families, our very way of life, might, you know, GLOAT otherwise!"

Writing for The Atlantic, former vigorous pandemic proponent, Emily Oster, says:

"The people who got it right, for whatever reason, may want to gloat. Those who got it wrong, for whatever reason, may feel defensive and retrench into a position that doesn’t accord with the facts. All of this gloating and defensiveness continues to gobble up a lot of social energy and to drive the culture wars, especially on the internet. These discussions are heated, unpleasant and, ultimately, unproductive. In the face of so much uncertainty, getting something right had a hefty element of luck. And, similarly, getting something wrong wasn’t a moral failing. Treating pandemic choices as a scorecard on which some people racked up more points than others is preventing us from moving forward."

I can't help but want to respond "lol", quite so egregiously absurd is this position. Actually, Emily, treating your fellow human beings like biohazards whilst condemning millions of people to unutterably awful abuse, tragedy, and loss is indeed a moral failing, and the ability to determine this from the start is not down to 'luck'.

Those now trying to peddle the puerile propaganda that "it's not our fault, we didn't know any better, we made the best choices available at the time", are just desperate, morally bankrupt liars who will now do and say anything, as the truth increasingly emerges, to save their own skin. (You'll see the same from Piers Morgan and Jeremy Vine soon, just as I said in my letter, but "not yet" - your socially engineering scriptwriters haven't built up enough 'suspense' yet.)

As I, and many, many others said during the course of "the pandemic" - Covid was never really a virus. It was a character test. A morality test. A human test. And many millions failed it, very, very severely. When you fail one of life's most crucial tests that badly, you don't get to simply dismiss it and enjoy a seamless graduation to the next chapter of life, without some very serious remedial study first.

What is particularly insidious about this swerve in the narrative is the devious attempts to admit to some wrongdoing, whilst still framing the whole situation in a completely fictitious way. The notion that "there was a serious pandemic but we handled it wrong", rather than - the easily verifiable truth - there was no pandemic. Rather, one was staged by social engineers as an exercise in behavioural psychology, to see how inhumanely they could get one human being to behave towards another, because "authority" said so (the precise nature of the famous Milgram experiments - the elites are very interested in funding experiments that assess how easy it is to strip human beings of their humanity).

I've found that, both now and even in the height of "the pandemic", it was pretty easy to get people to agree with the notion that many of the restrictions were ridiculous and over the top, but the general consensus was this was because the government was bumbling and incompetent, overreacting to a novel situation they didn't properly know how to handle.

This - and I need to be abundantly, unequivocally clear on this - is complete nonsense. This notion - that politicians were spooked by a grave public health emergency and so stumbled and made mistakes in handling it - is nothing but political theatre and science fiction. Top level politicians knew for years "a pandemic" was going to be staged (e.g., faked, just as I predicted back in April 2019) and that their roles were simply to perform as actors in a reality TV disaster movie. See the movie 'Contagion' for the exact blueprint, which Matt Hancock confirmed the UK based its pandemic response on.

It's important not to think of politics and showbiz as different and distinct things, but rather, two different soap operas, featuring different actors and filmed on different sets, but ultimately, exactly the same thing.

However, due to the fact that politics doesn't pay nearly as well as Hollywood, you don't exactly get Laurence Oliviers taking the lead in political theatre, which is why excruciatingly awful actors like Matt Hancock (and surely everyone now realises that's what he really is, now that he is starring in "I'm A Celebrity") totally unable to keep a straight face and literally crying with laughter, when they tell us on the telescreen that the first "life-saving vaccine" has been given to a man named William Shakespeare (who promptly died thereafter). They were telling us loud and clear - "this is an acted out drama. It's not real. How much clearer can we make this than by having the first recipient of this injection LITERALLY THE MAN WHO TOLD YOU "ALL THE WORLD'S A STAGE?!"

When you have the all powerful hypnotic might of the mass media at your disposal, it's really very easy to fake a pandemic. The print media and - especially - the TV whipped up mass fear and hysteria with their endless scaremongering, whilst some quite straightforward re-categorisation of disease and sleight of hand with statistics - and of course, the fake tests - completed the entirely fabricated illusion that we were in the midst of "a deadly pandemic".

Briefly, what happened was this: hospitals re-categorised 'flu and pneumonia cases as "Covid", whilst also fudging death certificates by attributing deaths to Covid, even when a patient was terminally ill with another condition, a tally which included those who had not been subject to a Covid test or had tested negative. Hospitals were also under strict instruction to follow certain 'protocols' - such as giving midazolam, remdisivir, and putting patients on ventilators - when many senior medics knew these were the wrong treatments and would expedite death (hence why all "Covid deaths" took place in institutional settings such as care homes and hospitals, and virtually none at home).

Regarding the PCR tests that supposedly ratified the notion we were in the middle of a deadly pandemic, these are completely useless and unfit for purpose, as the test's inventor repeatedly warned. He said, "anybody can test positive for anything with the PCR. It doesn't tell you you're sick", and then promptly and conveniently died, just weeks before the pandemic commenced.

The PCR test has past form for creating the illusion of pandemics, and so, whenever the ruling classes want to stage one (Covid, monkeypox, whatever), it is the perfect stage prop. To be clear, a positive result on the PCR for any condition tells you nothing about your state of health. It is completely clinically meaningless.

For all those people who say, "no, there was definitely a new virus, I got so ill, iller than I've ever been". Well, first of all, people say this every year - every time "flu season" (e.g., flu vaccine season) comes around, people are always claiming to be "iller than they've ever been". We are not always the most reliable narrators of our own experiences, and can convince ourselves we've "never been ill like this before", when actually we have - and this is especially true when the TV keeps telling us we are in the midst of "a deadly pandemic", because the power of the mind is exceptionally strong. If you believe there's a highly contagious dangerous epidemic sweeping the world, you are simply far more likely to develop symptoms of this disease, than people who do not hold that belief.

Furthermore, a two year period where people were constantly bathed in fear, brutally segregated from loved ones, denied opportunities for fresh air and exercise, and aggressively corralled into wrapping filthy pieces of suffocating cloth around their breathing apparatus, whilst repeatedly sticking contaminated bits of plastic far into their protective nasal membranes... is not exactly a recipe for good health. If you really were iller than you've ever been, it's probably because your lifestyle had become more unhealthy than it's ever been (especially since many dealt with the stresses of lockdown by binge eating and drinking, leading to a huge increase in type 2 diabetes and liver disease, since the "it's for your safety" lockdowns).

I can confidently assert that all us "Covid deniers", who followed none of the rules and believed one of the hype, were not "iller than we have ever been" and, if we were ill at all, just had normal seasonal respiratory illnesses. I had a cold in February 2020, as I often do that time of year, and I might have had another one in 2021 - I can't really remember - but that was it. I certainly was not "iller than I've ever been with the world's deadliest plague" (that 99.9% survive). The point is that the more you believed in the narrative, and the more government-mandated "precautions" you took, the more ill you undoubtedly were.

So, let me be very clear on what I am saying here: the government didn't innocently "get it wrong", doing their best with the information available at the time. The government, at its highest, deepest-state levels, staged the whole thing, precisely so they could experiment on the population to see how they would react to absurd and brutal anti-human tyranny.

Even if there had been a particularly virulent respiratory virus out there, all of the "restrictions" would still have been utterly absurd and unjustifiable at every level (moral, scientific, economic), but there actually wasn't. The whole thing was an illusion, a façade. "The Emperor's New Virus", as a friend of mine declared on her placard at the first London protest.

This is all way outside the Overton Window, therefore making it an extremely difficult concept for most people to even begin to comprehend, and so, they always respond with, "but... but... why would the government do something like that?!"

In order to give them an excuse to force the restrictions on you, especially the vaccines. That's why. If the government had told you, pre-pandemic "we need you to take five experimental injections over 2 years "for your safety". By the way, they were made by serial felons in a hurry", would you have done it? No. So they staged a "deadly pandemic" so you would.

The whole thing was basically an elaborate pharmaceutical marketing campaign. Equally, the social architects and human farmers behind all this wanted to test your morals and your character (since, as I say, behavioural psychologists have always been very interested in this subject, and just look how many behavioural psychologists there were on SAGE), and how reflexively obedient you would be to supposed "authority" when it instructed you to behave inhumanely to your fellow man - suffocating children with muzzles, forcing the elderly to die terrified and alone, denouncing your own closest family - oh, and let's not forget, the singing, dancing nurses we were instructed to seal-clap for, whilst patients were tortured to death around them.

The results of the "pandemic" experiment gave precisely the same results as previous, similar experiments have - that the majority of humanity will easily, and sometimes aggressively and gleefully, behave inhumanely and with barbarous indifference to human suffering, if a perceived authority tells them to. So, that was all "the pandemic" really was - a marketing and customer creation programme for a 'vaccine' (depopulation bioweapon), and a global experiment in behavioural psychology.

Therefore, this new call for an amnesty is, in my opinion, all part and parcel of the scripted world-stage drama. The social scriptwriters knew it would come to light how absurd and destructive the restrictions were (especially regarding the vaccine) - it was always part of the plan.

So, as the truth began to emerge, the scriptwriters planned for some of the most aggressive proponents of the restrictions to make beseeching (and really quite preposterous and pathetic) calls for an "amnesty", KNOWING the effect this would have on those of us who warned against the restrictions from the start.

The malevolently ingenious social engineers behind all this are past masters at understanding human psychology, and they know human beings have strong and hardwired requirements for accountability and justice, and that there was absolutely no way any of us who opposed the restrictions, and experienced such brutal inhumanity from those enforcing them, would just "let this go".

And that's the point. We're not supposed to. The ruling classes are setting the stage for an all-out civil war (well: I don't think it will be that civil), where the more that "the truth" is revealed - and I'd bookmark 21st November as a significant day, as that is when the new, very slick and clearly well-funded, documentary 'Died Suddenly' is being released - the more furious and bent on vengeance and justice the public at large will become, including and especially towards those now demanding amnesty, but who haven't taken accountability or apologised.

The idea that we should forgive people, who aren't even sorry, for such egregious crimes against humanity, crimes that have resulted in a far higher body count than all the most prolific serial killers combined, is such a ludicrous position, that it really isn't meant to engender a lot of sympathy. Rather, it is meant to further stoke up tensions and fury - and we should be furious - and to prompt the deafening, global battle cry that SOMETHING MUST BE DONE. These people must be subject to serious retribution, and this must never, ever be allowed to happen again.

This is all in keeping with the ever-growing narrative that our society is rotten to the core, that none of our existing institutions or authorities can be trusted, and so it ALL must be razed to the ground so we can start again with something completely new. Cue: The Great Reset and '6uild 6ack 6etter'.

So, yes, the calls for "amnesty" are appalling, tone-deaf, cheap, repulsive - just as they are meant to be. It's all part of the grisly dark magic "show". Anyone publicly and gleefully promoting the restrictions was nothing but a useful idiot who, now their usefulness has expired, will be thrown under the bus, just as such dupes and pawns always historically have been.

Anyone who played a prominent part in enforcing tyranny and brutality on their fellow man (including relishing the thought of "anti-vaxxers and anti-maskers" dying, which many openly did), if those people really now want amnesty, they must fully and deeply own up to what they did. They must admit that their behaviour was inhuman and unjustifiable, and that they made terrible mistakes for which there are no excuses other than their own weak character. And some people have indeed done that, for which I commend them.

But too many others have not. They are letting their pride and their ego get in the way and they will not accept just how terribly they got it wrong. Time is running out for them to do so. I believe in "forgiveness", but not blanket forgiveness with no conditions, because forgiveness, just like other key human concepts like respect, becomes utterly meaningless if we just uncritically extend it to everyone.

Forgiveness, just like respect, must be earned, and I am prepared to extend it entirely to those who really deserve it, who fully accept the enormity of their mistake and prove in word and in deed that they are truly sorry.

But anyone demanding an amnesty without being fully accountable for what they did, deserves nothing but the full force of retribution and justice as faced by all other despotic, murderous tyrants throughout history. "I was just going what the government told me" has never been a lawful or moral excuse for committing crimes against humanity and it won't be one now.

So, those of you now realising you got it so horribly, terribly wrong - pick your side. We're approaching 'season finale' for this particular dark pantomime and sinister psychology experiment, and so this is your very last chance. Make the right choice this time. The human one.