The Obama administration’s new Cybersecurity system
will only make the Internet more vulnerable to attack, while creating
the framework for a massively upgraded government surveillance grid
that will control and regulate every aspect of our daily lives through
the implementation of “smart” technology.
Obama’s announcement of the new cybersecurity grid
dovetails with a recently introduced Senate bill, the Cybersecurity Act
of 2009, that would hand the president the power to shut down the
entire Internet in the event of a “cybersecurity” crisis.
“The bill’s draft states that “the president may order
a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or shutdown of
Internet traffic” and would give the government ongoing access to “all
relevant data concerning (critical infrastructure) networks without
regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule, or policy restricting
such access,” reports Raw Story.
The legislation would allow the government to tap into
any digital aspect of every citizen’s information without a warrant.
Banking, business and medical records would be wide open to inspection,
as well as personal instant message and e mail communications.
This is President Bush’s warrantless wiretapping
program on steroids, yet the reaction from the liberal left has been
muted to say the least.
Furthermore, the reasoning behind the proposal is a
farce, since cybersecurity will make the Internet even more vulnerable
According to Jennifer Granick, director of civil
liberties at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the program would
“basically establish a path for the bad guys to skip down.”
One of the bill’s authors, Democratic Sen. Jay
Rockefeller of West Virginia, admitted that the bill was about more
than just military or intelligence concerns. “It is a lot more than
that. It suddenly gets into the realm of traffic lights and rail
networks and water and electricity,” said Rockefeller.
Essentially, this is the framework within which every
aspect of our lives will be managed and regulated by a gargantuan
government bureaucracy designed to control and shape every aspect of
our behavior through our dependence on technology.
Under the cybersecurity grid, our electricity
consumption, our water consumption and every other basic utility that
we rely upon will be subject to state regulation.
This is already being introduced through “smart”
technology, manifesting in such things as fridges that are controlled
by power companies and not the individual. If you are deemed to have
bypassed government-approved levels of consumption, your fridge will be
automatically turned off remotely.
“A domestic refrigerator that can be turned on and off
by the electricity supplier without the homeowner being aware is to go
on trial,” reported the Daily Mail in January.
“Npower will distribute 300 ‘smart fridges’ free to homeowners
throughout Britain within the next five weeks as part of the energy
companies’ efforts to tackle climate change.”
“At times of high demand, the National Grid will activate the
switches in the fridges to achieve a balance in the power supply. The
development means that, for the first time, consumers will lose control
over the use of electricity in their own homes,” stated the report.
All British homes are also set to have “smart” electricity and gas
meters installed by law by 2020. The meters would “record energy use”
according to a Reuters report.
This is just the beginning of the imposition of a suffocating prison
planet whereby our every action will not only be recorded by big
brother but also subject to government approval and control.
The Cybersecurity grid will also be an upgrade of the
pervasive snoop network that has already been operating under NSA
auspices for decades.
During a speech last week on “cybersecurity,” Obama told a whopper.
He said the government’s effort to protect us from cyber bad guys “will
not include monitoring private sector networks or Internet traffic. We
will preserve and protect the personal privacy and civil liberties that
we cherish as Americans.”
Is it possible Obama has never heard of Mark Klein,
the retired AT&T communications technician who said years ago that
the company shunted all Internet traffic — including traffic from
peering links connecting to other Internet backbone providers — to
semantic traffic analyzers, installed in a secret room inside the
AT&T central office on Folsom Street in San Francisco? There are
similar rooms in Seattle, San Jose, Los Angeles and San Diego, all
sucking up internet data.
Klein explained that the multinational corporation is doing this at
the behest of the NSA. It is “vacuum-cleaner surveillance” approach
that grabs everything. “Despite what we are hearing, and considering
the public track record of [the Bush] administration, I simply do not
believe their claims that the NSA’s spying program is really limited to
foreign communications or is otherwise consistent with the NSA’s
charter or with FISA [the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act],” said
Klein in 2006.
After the NSA showed up in 2002 at AT&T’s Folsom Street
facility, Klein began connecting the dots. “You might recall there was
a big blowup in the news about the Total Information Awareness [TIA]
program, led by Adm. [John] Poindexter, which caused the big upsetness
in Congress, because what Poindexter was proposing to do was draw in
databases from everywhere — and this was in The New York Times — draw
in Internet data, bank records, travel records, everything into one big
conglomeration which could be searchable by the government so they
could find out everything about what anybody’s doing at any time of
day,” Klein told PBS.
“And all this would be done without any warrants. This is how it was
presented by Poindexter himself in The New York Times, and that caused
a great upset, brouhaha, in Congress.”
On January 16, 2003, Senator Russ Feingold introduced legislation to
suspend the activity of the Total Information Awareness program pending
a Congressional review of privacy issues involved. In February 2003,
Congress passed legislation suspending activities of the IAO
(Information Awareness Office) pending a Congressional report of the
Congress acted after William Safire published an article in the New
York Times claiming “[TIA] has been given a $200 million budget to
create computer dossiers on 300 million Americans” (see You Are a Suspect, November 14, 2002).
Of course, the program didn’t go away. Legislators included a
classified annex to the Defense Appropriations Act that preserved
funding for TIA’s component technologies, if they were transferred to
other government agencies. TIA projects continued to be funded under
classified annexes to Defense and Intelligence appropriation bills.
“Total Information Awareness — the all-seeing terrorist spotting
algorithm-meets-the-mother-of-all-databases that was ostensibly
de-funded by Congress in 2003, never actually died, and was largely
rebuilt in secret by the NSA, according to the Wall Street Journal’s
Siobhan Gorman,” Ryan Singel
wrote for Wired on March 10, 2008. “There’s been no real debate in
Congress or in the press about whether the government should be allowed
to track every Americans phone calls, emails and web browsing.”
writing for Ars Technica, notes that TIA technology is nothing new.
“TIA-like efforts are still going on” Stokes wrote in 2005, and “the
government has been trying to use new technology, like database tech
and voice recognition, for domestic surveillance for a long time. And
when I say a long time, I mean well before the current administration
came into office.” It really got a boost under Clinton in 1995 when the
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) was passed.
“CALEA mandated that the telcos aid wiretapping by installing remote
wiretap ports onto their digital switches so that the switch traffic
would be available for snooping by law enforcement.” In other words,
Mark Klein had but scratched the surface.
Truman created the NSA in 1952, supposedly to serve as “America’s
ears” abroad, but the agency has long served as a secret Stasi-like
organization dedicated to snooping on Americans. The NSA, writes Siobhan Gorman
for the Wall Street Journal, “and other intelligence agencies were
found to be using their spy tools to monitor Americans for political
The NSA’s predecessor, the Armed Forces Security Agency, launched
Project SHAMROCK in 1945. It obtained copies of all telegraphic
information exiting or entering the United States with the full
cooperation of RCA, ITT and Western Union. A sister project known as
Project MINARET involved the creation of “watch lists,” by each of the
intelligence agencies and the FBI, of those accused of “subversive”
domestic activities. The watch lists included such notables as Martin
Luther King, Malcolm X, Jane Fonda, Joan Baez and Dr. Benjamin Spock,
according to Patrick S. Poole,
writing for Nexus Magazine in 1999. The FBI, the NSA, and other
intelligence agencies were actively involved in creating the watch
NSA has attempted to keep up on technology as the secretive agency
continues to snoop on “subversives” and others the government considers
miscreants. In February, trade publications reported the agency is
offering “billions” to any firm able to offer reliable eavesdropping on
Skype IM and voice traffic. Skype is particularity troublesome because
it utilizes P2P networks, that is to say peer-top-peer (no central
server owned and operated by a telecom required). The government and
the corporate media may tell you they want to crack down on P2P — for
instance, the vastly popular BitTorrent — because of copyright
infringement, but a more practical reason is because the government has
yet to figure out how to crack the file sharing protocol. Skype and
BitTorrent account for a large amount of traffic on the internet.
If you think Obama will roll back the government’s massive and
unconstitutional snoop program, think again. On April 3, the Obama
Department of Justice filed a motion to dismiss one of the Electronic
Frontier Foundation’s landmark lawsuits against illegal spying by the
NSA. The DOJ demanded that the entire lawsuit be dismissed based on
both the Bush administration’s claim that a “state secrets” privilege
bars any lawsuits against the executive branch for illegal spying, as
well as a novel “sovereign immunity” claim that the Patriot Act bars
lawsuits of any kind for illegal government surveillance (see the EFF
press release, Obama Administration Embraces Bush Position on Warrantless Wiretapping and Secrecy).
In March, Obama’s coordinator for cybersecurity programs, Rod Beckstrom,
a former Silicon Valley entrepreneur, quit because he opposed the role
of the NSA in the so-called cybersecurity initiative. Beckstrom said
“the threats to our democratic processes are significant if all top
level government network security and monitoring are handled by” the
“Obama’s moves drew praise from key lawmakers on Capitol Hill, who
vowed to work with the president to implement new security measures as
reported shortly after his “cybersecurity” speech. “Obama said his
cybersecurity adviser — who will be a member of both the National
Security Staff and the National Economic Council staff — will head a
new office within the White House.”
“We applaud President Obama for highlighting the extraordinarily
serious issue of cybersecurity,” Sens. Johns D. Rockefeller IV, D-W.V.,
and Olympia J. Snowe , R-Maine, said in a joint statement. “No other
president in American history has elevated this issue to that level and
we think him for his leadership.”
No other president so far has had the power to shut down the
internet. The Rockefeller-Snowe bill, S 778, would grant Obama
dictatorial power declare a so-called “cyber emergency” and pull the
plug, or at least cripple networks deemed a threat. The U.S. government
is not seriously worried about Chinese hackers or mischievous kids in
Latvia (as Rockefeller cited as a danger) but rather fear free and
unfettered speech and activism on the part of its own citizens.
Obama’s promise is merely an effort to string you along with a big
fat lie. He has absolutely no respect for you or the Bill of Rights.