Survey of peer reviewed studies reveals
less than 50% of published scientists believe global warming is man
made. More skeptics than advocates among scientific community while
IPCC claim majority endorse the theory . infowars.com
Steve Watson A new survey of over 500 peer reviewed scientific
research papers on climate change, written between 2004 and 2007, has
concluded that less than half endorse what has been dubbed the
"consensus view," that human activity is contributing to considerable
global climate change.
In direct
conflict with assertions by the International Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) that a scientific consensus agrees it is 90% likely that man is
responsible for warming, Medical researcher Dr. Klaus-Martin Schulte's
survey contends that only 45% support the theory and that is only if
you include papers that merely lean towards endorsement. Though the survey has not yet been released, the results have been submitted to the journal Energy and Environment , and science blog DailyTech has obtained a pre-publication copy which states:
Of
528 total papers on climate change, only 38 (7%) gave an explicit
endorsement of the consensus. If one considers "implicit" endorsement
(accepting the consensus without explicit statement), the figure rises
to 45%. However, while only 32 papers (6%) reject the consensus
outright, the largest category (48%) are neutral papers, refusing to
either accept or reject the hypothesis. This is no "consensus."
The figures are even more shocking when one remembers the watered-down
definition of consensus here. Not only does it not require supporting
that man is the "primary" cause of warming, but it doesn't require any
belief or support for "catastrophic" global warming. In fact of all
papers published in this period (2004 to February 2007), only a single
one makes any reference to climate change leading to catastrophic
results.
Man made warming proponents have often pointed to a similar survey that was conducted by history professor Naomi Oreskes
on peer-reviewed papers published on the ISI Web of Science database
from 1993 to 2003 which found that a majority of scientists supported
the theory.
Dr. Klaus-Martin Schulte
sought to update the research and according to DailyTech, used the same
database and search terms as Oreskes but reached a radically different
conclusion.
The introduction and the
summary of the IPCC's report was written entirely by politicians under
the mandate of the UN, the input of actual scientists was minimal. In
addition, all sections that were written by selected scientists were edited to comply with the report summary.
Some of the scientists involved even admitted
that the IPCC models failed to accurately predict climate change and
that "none of the climate states in the models corresponds even
remotely to the current observed climate".
By
contrast, the ISI Web of Science database covers 8,700 journals and
publications, including every leading scientific journal in the world
and is not directly influenced by any governmental body.
Schulte's survey confirms the claim that the climate change momentum has shifted among prominent scientists who are now benefiting from a greater depth of research. A spate of new research papers has significantly chilled fears of global warming.
The
new survey provides undeniable proof that the world is being sold a lie
on climate change by a group of politicians and elite lobbyists who
wish to seize on the opportunity to hype the global warming threat and
use it as a means of social manipulation for political and corporate
gain.
As we have extensively reported, it is the elites, the establishment and big business interests that are pushing these fears , not the scientific community.
People
who still trust the platitudes of politicians and elitists who implore
us to change our way of life, cough up more tax money, and get on board
with the global warming religion save being linked with Holocaust denial,
are as deluded and enslaved as the tribes of Mesoamerica who, unaware
of the natural phenomenon of a solar eclipse, thought their high
priests could make the sky snake eat the Sun, and therefore obeyed
their every demand.
Politicians are professional
liars, they make careers out of deceiving people and twisting reality
to fit pre-conceived agendas, yet a cascade of otherwise rationally
minded people are eager to blindly trust everything they have to say
about climate change, no matter how delusional it sounds.
They
are also willing to comply with the ridiculous overbearing "solutions"
to climate change that will just coincidentally restrict mobility and
freedom of travel, regulate personal behavior, empower and expand
global government and reinvigorate the surveillance state - everything
Big Brother ever wanted - but surely they wouldn't lie to us about
global warming to achieve it, would they?
For a wealth of information on the man made global warming hoax check our archive
which has scores of articles and multimedia files relating to the
science of global warming as well as the agenda behind the hype
|
Description:
Description:
Description:
Please take a moment to comment on or contribute to this article