verything in our lives is manipulated by governments and corporations and it is a combination of apathy and ignorance of the establishments system of control itself that enables this to happen. -People police themselves, and get stuck in a bubble of fear because when it becomes a 'crime' to have views, interests and beliefs that differ greatly from what people are generally used to hearing about, the people who speak of 'weird' information were usually judged, but as the fascist world government is blatantly being set up more and more people are awakening to how important it is to secure our freedoms and the freedoms and ability for prosperity of our children. Widespread public knowledge of governments creating problems to offer their 'solutions' is key to saving all of Humanity against this planned DICTATORSHIP system. You have great power. The people outnumber the so called 'elite' dramatically, and they fear this power, as we can see the internet will be under government control VERY SOON, so GO NOW AND POST THESE POSTERS EVERYWHERE YOU CAN IN LEGAL PLACES!
This poster covers briefly various threats the globalist establishment in control are doing, and how knowing about it will prevent us from being manipulated and tricked by those planning to set up a tyrannical world government.
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER! - THINK FOR YOURSELF AND STOP BEING BRAINWASHED!
"Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies.
- Thomas Jefferson
"The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution. I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but Coin. If the American People (and all people of the world) allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless..."
- Thomas Jefferson
It is felt in the hearts and minds of everyone who can think; something is not right. Can you see through the lies? Can you? If you can't, I challenge you to research the world you live in.
Gordon Brown
has been accused of rushing through the ratification of a treaty with
Tripoli that could pave the way for the repatriation of the Lockerbie
bomber as part of a British push to protect oil interests in Libya.
Amid
signs that a decision on the release of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi could be
made within days, senior MPs and peers said ministers in London had
overlooked human rights in their haste to ratify the agreement.
Kenny
MacAskill, the Scottish justice secretary, is poised to decide whether
Megrahi, who has terminal prostate cancer, should be allowed to return
home on compassionate grounds. The former Libyan intelligence agent,
57, is serving a life sentence with a minimum term of 27 years after
being convicted in 2001 of the bombing of Pan Am flight 103, which
killed 270 people.
Overnight, the US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton,
also piled more pressure on the Scottish government saying it would be
"absolutely wrong" to release Megrahi, adding: "We are still
encouraging the Scottish authorities not to do so and we hope that they
will not."
Clinton has already called MacAskill to say Megrahi should serve out his sentence in Scotland.
After
the bomber's appeal hearing, she told US reporters: "I just think it is
absolutely wrong to release someone who has been imprisoned based on
the evidence about his involvement in such a horrendous crime."
Yesterday,
three judges at the high court in Edinburgh accepted an application by
Megrahi to drop his second appeal against his conviction. The bomber's
move has fuelled speculation that he has brokered a deal with the
Scottish authorities to clear the way for his return home.
A
spokeswoman for MacAskill said that the justice secretary had not yet
made a decision and that he could still decide to keep Megrahi in his
specially built cell in Greenock prison. Should MacAskill decide to
allow Megrahi to return to Libya, he would leave in one of two ways:
• Released into the care of his family on compassionate grounds under existing Scottish law;
•
Transferred to a Libyan prison under the terms of the Prisoner Transfer
Agreement, signed by Britain and Libya last November and formally
ratified on 29 April this year. Currently, this option is seen as
unlikely because a Crown appeal against his sentence remains
outstanding.
MPs and peers on the joint human rights committee
have said they had been denied the chance by the government to
scrutinise the treaty properly after ministers rushed through the
measure in a bid to protect business interests in Libya.
Jack
Straw, the justice secretary, told the committee in a letter on 12
March: "Both the foreign secretary and I believe, in the interests of
our judicial and wider bilateral relations with Libya, it is important
to ratify... a delay beyond April is likely to lead to serious
questions on the part of Libya in regards to our willingness to
conclude these agreements."
In a sharply worded response, the
committee said: "We... regret that we have been unable to publish a
substantive report on the treaty before Easter and, therefore, before
ratification."
Andrew Dismore, the Labour chairman of the
committee, said the treaty was rushed through to pave the way for the
release of Megrahi.
Committee members said the government was
keen to protect British business interests. Richard Shepherd, a
Conservative member, told the Guardian: "We clearly have an interest
because of the discovery of even vaster energy resources. Governments
are always juggling that. But that is no reason for us not to
scrutinise and see whether a piece of legislation is appropriate."
The
Earl of Onslow, another Tory member, said: "This is not a good way to
deal with matters of justice. One shouldn't allow whether one has a
right to drill for oil in the Gulf of Sidra to have any influence on
what is essentially a criminal matter."
In recent years, the
government has faced criticism for turning a blind eye to human rights
abuses in Libya after Tony Blair formally ended Colonel Muammar
Gaddafi's pariah status in March 2004, when he visited the Libyan
leader in his tent on the outskirts of Tripoli. Blair made the trip
months after Gaddafi announced that he was abandoning Libya's programme
to develop weapons of mass destruction.
In the years since
Blair's visit, Britain has built extensive business interests with
Libya. The Duke of York has made two official visits to Libya over the
past two years in his role as Britain's special representative for
international trade and investment, as well as what Buckingham Palace
described as a "small number" of private visits.
Sir Richard
Dalton, a former British ambassador to Libya, warned that relations
would be damaged if Megrahi were allowed to die in prison. But he
added: "I think people who try to say [the Megrahi case] is part of an
unseemly rush for contract favours are absolutely wrong. This is first
and last a judicial matter."
A family in Williamson County, Austin have lost custody of their
7-year-old son as part of a Child Protective Services investigation
because the parents taught their children to mistrust the government,
an action that deemed them to be “unsuitable parents,” according to
charges leveled by police officers in CPS documents.
Drug reform activist filmmakers Barry and Candi Cooper recently had
their home raided and searched by police after authorities claimed
Cooper’s voice had been heard in the background of an allegedly false
police report.
“Once in the couple’s home, officers discovered a small amount of
marijuana and charged the Coopers with Class B misdemeanors, resulting
in both their arrests. Each immediately bonded out of jail and paid a
small fine. Days later, while Candi’s youngest son was visiting his
father in east Texas, Child Protective Services contacted the Coopers,
revealing that the incident could cost them not only custody of the
boy, but also their freedom on felony child endangerment charges,” writes Stephen C. Webster of True Slant, who has been following the case.
On page five of the CPS case report, police level the shocking claim
that the Coopers are “unsuitable parents” because they teach their
children “the government is out to harm them”.
On page six of the report, police accuse the Coopers of being
“aggressive to authority” because they will not allow government
employees to enter their house without a court order.
Despite Travis County Deputy District Attorney Dayna Blazey
declaring the Coopers to be fit parents, whose children are healthy,
happy and “well cared for,” and stating that the kids were not at risk,
Williamson County police claim the Coopers allow their children and
their friends to use drugs in the house.
Ominously, police also characterize the Coopers educating their
children that the drug war is evil as an act of ‘mental abuse’.
“In another completely dumbfounding, ironic entry, Sgt.
Gary Haston of the Williamson County Sheriff’s Department — the officer
whose testimony appears on the original search warrant affidavit —
actually claims he observed the children “crying for no reason” as armed officers invaded their home,” writes Webster. [Emphasis added.]
“He also claims that Barry “hates” his father and does not believe
in church, as though this information would somehow be relevant to the
CPS agents.”
The real reason Barry Cooper, a former police officer and Drug
Enforcement Agent, is being targeted undoubtedly relates to his work in
catching police engaged in corruption and other criminal activity,
specifically relating to the drug war. Cooper is the man behind the hit
underground DVD, Never Get Busted Again,
which teaches people how to react to police oppression and has appeared
on the Alex Jones Show to discuss his work on several occasions.
When Annie Brown’s daughter, Isabel, was a month old, her pediatrician
asked Brown and her husband to sit down because he had some bad news to
tell them: Isabel carried a gene that put her at risk for cystic
fibrosis.
While grateful to have the information — Isabel received further
testing and she doesn’t have the disease — the Mankato, Minnesota,
couple wondered how the doctor knew about Isabel’s genes in the first
place. After all, they’d never consented to genetic testing.
It’s simple, the pediatrician answered: Newborn babies in the United
States are routinely screened for a panel of genetic diseases. Since
the testing is mandated by the government, it’s often done without the
parents’ consent, according to Brad Therrell, director of the National
Newborn Screening & Genetics Resource Center.
The
clamor to ramp up airport security with invasive naked body imaging
scanners has nothing to do with ensuring the safety of travelers.
Rather it is part of an ongoing incremental push to break the will of
the people and encourage mass subservience and meek obedience.
Perhaps the most alarming aspect of the body scanner push is that people are willingly accepting it. As Bloomberg news reports today,
“Passenger acceptance of airport body scanners has increased following
the failed terrorist attack,” with 92% of passengers at Manchester
airport in northern England now agreeing to pass through the machines
in a voluntary trial, compared with 75 percent before the incident.
The same report indicates that Around 90% of Muslims and Orthodox
Jews were opting to use the scanners even prior to the Detroit incident
rather than risking physical contact via pat downs and strip searches.
Travelers in Canada have indicated acceptance of the scanners, saying that they would “do anything for safety” and describing them as “a necessary evil”.
Meanwhile, nearly two-thirds of Germans favour airports using
full-body scanners, despite claims that they are an invasion of
personal privacy, a new poll has shown.
The will of the people is being systematically eroded and
incrementally broken down. Airports are serving as reservations where
the fundamental right to privacy must be left at the door.
Travelers have been acclimatized over time to know they must remove
their shoes, take off their belts, untuck shirts, discard water, baby
milk, shampoo and toothpaste. During the flight hands must be visible
on laps, and even bathroom visits can now become national incidents as we have recently seen.
A culture of extreme fear has been engendered where the only way to
stay safe is to cozy up to big brother, a psychological response akin
to that of Stockholm syndrome.
This is where the technological control grid plays such a key role.
Imagine if TSA agents were made to take women and children and
physically strip search them while they held their hands aloft, the
public would balk at such an abuse. However, with the body scanning
machines there is a divide that clouds the process in futuristic
technology.
Spot the difference: Top – A TSA agent inspects a naked
image of a woman in full public view. Bottom – A Nazi officer inspects
the private parts of a woman while forcing her husband and children to
watch.
Note that in many of the images from the body scanners used by the
media, people are shown to be concealing a gun or a knife, with their
hands held in the air above their heads. This puts out the subconscious
notion that everyone passing through the machines is guilty and has
been caught by the authorities engaging in a law breaking act.
We are also being incrementally taught that what goes on in the
airports will be transferred to the streets, schools, shopping malls,
rail stations and bus terminals.
The same technology is being considered by governments for general use in cameras on the street. Once accepted as part of everyday life in airports, it becomes much easier to sell for use in all public places.
X-ray specs were once considered a pervert’s fantasy science fiction invention, now they have become a reality.
With such technology at their disposal the already active TSA viper teams will no doubt patrol mass transit facilities with much more vigor.
All of this is being rolled out despite numerous issues that raise questions aside from the assault on privacy.
The scanners are similar to C-Scans and carry health risks. They fire ionizing radiation at those inside which penetrates a few centimeters into the flesh and reflects off the skin to form a naked body image.
Research shows that even very low doses of X-ray can delay or
prevent cellular repair of damaged DNA, yet pregnant women and children
will be subjected to the process if new guidelines including scanners
are adopted.
The machines also break child pornography laws in the UK that bar the production of indecent images of children.
No matter that the Amsterdam airport where the so called underwear
bomber boarded already had the scanners installed, the solution is more
scanners!
No matter that designers of the technology have admitted that the machine would not have detected explosive materials hidden within clothing, the solution is more scanners!
All these issues have led even mainstream sources to question the validity of the freedom crushing initiatives being rolled out en mass.
Meanwhile we continue to be bombarded with fearmongering rhetoric
that unless we give up all our liberties and submit to gross invasions
of privacy, airliners will start to fall from the sky.
If the public willingly accepts naked imaging x-ray machines in the name of security, what comes next?
The former EU justice Commissioner says that scanning inside people’s bodies is an acceptable proposal. Microsoft has suggested slapping monitoring bracelets on all it’s employees. The TSA is considering taser bracelets that can deliver electric shocks to anyone who steps out of line inside an airport or on a plane.
Passport control officers at airports are to be phased out as new biometric face scanning cameras are set to replace them under UK border control measures that came into force last year. A global biometric facial scan database is the end goal of security authorities the world over.
Other proposals include placing the cameras in every seat on aircraft and installing software to try and automatically detect terrorists or other dangers caused by passengers.
Passive brain scanners that pick up brain waves in order to sense
the behaviour of travelers have already been trialed in airports. The
technology known as “MALINTENT” has been developed by the Department of Homeland Security under a project lovingly called “Project Hostile Intent”. The following image is a DHS Impression of the mindreader technology in action.
The development of all of this nightmare technology only emphasizes the need for immediate outright rejection
of the mass implementation of body screeners. If we continue to allow
such gross attacks on our liberties to succeed the onslaught will never
end.
Watch Alex Jones’ rant on this subject from yesterday’s show:
Adobe Flash Player not installed or older than 9.0.115!
Adobe Flash Player not installed or older than 9.0.115!
Adobe Flash Player not installed or older than 9.0.115!
Of course, life could be different. Society could be intelligently organized to meet the real needs of the general population. You and others like you could collectively fight to free yourselves from our domination. But you don't know that. In fact, you can't even imagine that another way of life is possible. And that's probably the greatest, most significant achievement of our system — robbing you of your imagination, your creativity, your ability to think and act for yourself. So we'd truly like to thank you from the bottom of our heartless hearts. Your loyal sacrifice makes possible our corrupt luxury; your work makes our system work. Thanks so much for "knowing your place" - without even knowing it!
"If ignorance is bliss, why aren't more people happy?"Thomas Jefferson
Description:
Description:
Description:
The
clamor to ramp up airport security with invasive naked body imaging
scanners has nothing to do with ensuring the safety of travelers.
Rather it is part of an ongoing incremental push to break the will of
the people and encourage mass subservience and meek obedience.
